The first and biggest lie by Obama to the American people was the lie and continued lies about his past, including his Forged Birth Certificate Records, Forged Social Security Forms, College Records, Forged Passport Records, and Illinois State Bar Records.
Maybe the biggest lie by Obama, before FastAndFuriousGate and BenghaziGate, and most American people are still not even aware of this lie to this day, is his Executive Order 13489 that he enacted as soon as he took the office of President in the Whitehouse. This Executive Order, that Obama spent $5,000,000 on to get done, is an Executive Order to seal all of his records of the past where no one or entity can ever open his past records. So Obama will forever be a fake and fictional President with fake records.
BenghaziGate is a full-fledge Massive Coverup to protect both Obama and Hillary, but don’t forget the qually scandalous Obama and Eric Holder massive Coverup in FastAndFuriousGate!
“Aren’t we all appalled that after almost two months. Obama, Hillary, and the Whitehouse are still changing their stories about what really happened at BenghaziGate and we probably will never know the real truth behind all of it.”
Now, we have VoterFraudGate!
On Election Day, Obama and David Axelrod, his campaign manager, had Armed Black Panther Terrorists in the streets in Cuyahoga County, Ohio and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, two key voting election stations in the Obama re-election Campaign. There also were many reports of massive “Dead-People” voting.
And then on top of all of this. Obama and Akelrod were able to Fraud the Overseas Military Personnel by making sure that they did not get their ballots until one day after the Election. All of their ballots would have made a difference, but the Liberal Media will not call them on it.
And Now! DavidPetraeusGate!
Let me start by saying that I have been a huge fan of General David Petraeus for many years and if I was to have a Military Hero, then it was General David Petraeus. But after saying that, I have to be honest. I started to have questions about David Petraues when he was asked by Communist Barry Obama to become his CIA Director.
General Petraeus is the most celebrated American General of our generation and he was credited with turning the War around in Iraq in 2007. Then, he became the Commander in Afghanistan in 2010.
With such a great and illustrious Military history and being such a great American Military Hero, why would Petraeus want to jeopardize his stellar Military and intelligence career and Hero status to work for a guy like Obama who has betrayed the Military in every opportunity that he has ever had? It just never made any sense to me when he took the CIA job, but it might make more sense now and Bribery might be the key word. The White House had something on Petraeus and would use it as a “Trump Card” and would wait until they needed something from him before they would use it
The Dictionary defines Bribery as: a favor or money promised to a person to influence something or to influence conduct.
The first Bribery that occurred with Petraeus and the White House was with the extramarital affair. Obama, David Axelrod, and Eric Holder had that “Trump-Card” for a huge favor and the “Trump Card” was called upon in the BenghaziGate Coverup announcement that it was not Terrorists, but an anti-Muhammed video that caused the Benghazi Attack.
There sometimes is a very fine-line between Bribery and Blackmail. So you need to know what the definition of Blackmail: Extortion by threats of public exposure. You also must be aware that Axelrod and Holder have done a great job of Blackmailing people for decades and it’s public record that they did it in Obama Elections.
So then, the second Bribery or Blackmail occurred after the Election.
At first, I thought that Petraeus might have cut a great deal with David Axelrod, but after they forced him out of his CIA Director job, there is a lingering question. Do they really think we are all that Stupid? The White House is still afraid of something, so they called on their “Trump Card” to force Petraeus out of his job.
Paula Broadwell, a counter terrorism expert met Petraeus in 2006 at a speech he gave at Harvard University. They became friends at that time, but it got a little more serious a few years later. Petraeus says the affair started in 2011, but they were very friendly since 2008. Then Petraeus became CIA Director in September of 2011.
Now, the story that has been given to the Liberal Media.
Former CIA Director General David Petraeus had an extramarital affair, with Paula Broadwell and because of it, his resignation was held off until after the Election on Tuesday to avoid “Potential Embarrassment” for President Barack Hussein Obama.
FBI agents learned of the Petraeus affair while monitoring his emails out of concern that the woman, biographer Paula Broadwell, might have had access to his personal and confidential CIA Email Account, as reported by the Associated Press.
An FBI source told Ronald Kessler, the author and journalist who broke the Secret Service prostitution scandal, that rather than have Petraeus resign immediately, the decision was made to hold it until after the election for Political Reasons, not to harm President Barack Obama.
Then the resignation occurred three days, how convenient, after the Election to avoid the possibility of embarrassment and of course the real reason and that was if Patraeus is gone, then there will be no testifying in the BenghaziGate Hearings.
The precise timeline of the FBI investigation and discovery of the affair is still unclear. The Wall Street Journal said that the Patraeus Email investigation began late in the spring, but that Petraeus wasn’t interviewed until recently.
Despite the FBI report that the White House held off on asking for Petraeus to step down until after the Election, the Associated Press reported that White House officials were first notified of the affair on Wednesday, the day after the election, and that Obama was not informed until Thursday morning. Yeah, and I have some land in Arizona that I want to sell you. This is so transparent.
Former CIA Director and General David Petraeus may have told his mistress Paula Broadwell what really happened in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 when terrorists murdered U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
Broadwell, a Military Counter Terriorist Expert, whose affair with Petraeus forced him to resign last Friday, revealed during an October 26 speech at the University of Denver that Libyan terrorists may have attacked the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 in order to take back Libyan militia members that the CIA Annex had taken prisoner.
Broadwell confirmed that the CIA Annex in Benghazi had requested reinforcements and the White House could have easily reinforced the consulate and the CIA Annex that was under attack. Broadwell also confirmed that Petraeus and administration officials knew within 24 hours of the possible motives behind the terrorist attacks.
In January of 2009, the Obama administration ordered all secret interrogation camps abroad to be closed. The comments of Broadwell would lead you to believe that the CIA Annex that captured Libyan militia members may still have been operational.
“Now, I don’t know if any of you have heard about this, but the CIA Annex had actually taken a couple or three of Libyan militia members as prisoner, and we thought that the attack on the U.S. Consulate was an effort to try get those prisoners back, and that’s still being vetted,” Broadwell said.
Broadwell, who was speaking at her alma mater about her biography of Petraeus, confirmed that the Fox News Report of Jennifer Griffin had insightful and accurate information that came out on the day of her speech. Broadwell further stated that the Obama administration had denied Americans on the ground in Benghazi the security and help that they had requested, telling NAVY SEALS in Libya who wanted to help U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans who were eventually murdered to Stand-Down.
“The facts that came out is that the ground forces there at the CIA Annex, which is different from the U.S. Consulate, were requesting reinforcements,” Broadwell said.
“They were requesting the CINC’s (Commander-in-Chief’s) In Extremis Force, a group of Delta Force operators who our very best and most talented guys that we have in the military. They could have come and reinforced the U.S. Consulate and the CIA Annex that were under attack.”
Here is where the first Bribery takes place. Petraeus is told to lie about the truth and what really happened and the White House and Eric Holder had this sex scandal hanging over his head. So Petraeus lied to the American people and to the Liberal Media as to what really happened and claimed that the Benghazi attack was initiated by an anti-Muhammed Video.
“The Challenging Thing for Petraeus was, as Director of the CIA, he was ordered by Obama and the White House to not have any communication with the press,” said Broadwell.
“So he’s known all of this. They had correspondence with the CIA Station Chief in Libya, within 24 hours and they knew exactly what was happening,” Broadwell said.
The Obama administration tried to claim an anti-Muhammed video caused the terrorist attacks and has repeatedly punted on whether they had turned down any additional security measures and reinforcements that were requested. Broadwell said there was a system failure that led to four Americans being murdered in part because additional security forces were denied.
“It is a tragedy that we lost our Ambassador Chris Stevens, other government officials, and two NAVY SEALS, because there was additional security requested,” Broadwell said. “It’s frustrating to see the sort of political aspect of what’s going on with this whole investigation. It’s political hunting season, and so this whole thing has been politicized.”
Petreaus did testify before U.S. Congress on Friday about Benghazi before his prompt resignation, but we really did not learn much, except that someone in the White House took out the “Official” word “Terrorist” out of the CIA Report. This causes more questions, but it still does not give us any answers in the BenghaziGate Scandal.
The American people were hoping that they would somehow, someway find out the Truth in this BenghaziGate Massive Coverup, but I still would bet the farm that we will ever find out the real truth about what really happened.
Also remember, back on September 13 when Petraeus came out of a Press Conference and was asked what happened in Benghazi and he answered: “Do you want to know what I told the Press or do you want to know what really happened,” said Petraeus.
Now, here are the startling facts that have not been brought up for fear of hurting Obama, Axelrod, and Holder. What is Obama and the White House still trying to hide and what is the “Real Benghazi Coverup” that can not get out to the American People?
The truth is that our United States Congress had a “Gun-Running Operation” to the Syrian Terrorists. The big question right now: was it done legally or illegally? If it was done legally, then there are eight congressmen, four Dems and four GOP, who knew about it. If it was done, illegally, then we need to know who authorized it.
If it was done legally, then Diane Feinstein knew about it and if it was done illegally, then she needed to know about it. Either way, these United States Congressmen are politically motivated to keep it quiet, but by doing so, they are committing Treason to the highest degree.
This is one reason why Obama let Ambassador Chris Stevens and NAVY SEALS Ty Woods and Glen Doherty die, because Obama and the White House did not want either our CIA or FBI to find out that the Syrian Terrorists were using our own guns to kill our own American people.
On Wednesday, Obama had his first White House Press Day in almost eight months, and Obama was asked if he tried to do anything to help to save Ambassador Chris Stevens and NAVY SEALS Ty Woods and Glen Dotherty and he again evaded the question. “I will not answer any questions in the Press, regarding our dead Americans, but instead, I will address their families,” said Obama in a very rude answer to FoxNews Reporter Ed Henry.
“Mr. Obama is so disingenuious when he is talking about my dead son,” said Charles Woods on the Sean Hannity Show on Thursday, November 15. “Mr Obama has not once contacted us and he’s lying when he says that he has contacted us.”
Charles Woods also described his brief encounter with President Obama during the ceremony for the Libya victims. “Even at the graveside funeral for Ty and Glen, Mr. Obama would not look at me straight in the face. The CIA Timeline shows that everyone knew that Ty was asking for help and did not get it,” Woods further stated to Hannity.
“When he finally came over to where I was, I could tell that he was rather conflicted, a person who was not at peace,” Woods said. “Shaking hands with him, quite frankly, was like shaking hands with a dead fish. His face was pointed towards me, but he would not look me in the eye, his eyes were over my shoulder.”
“I could tell that he was not sorry,” Woods added. “He had no remorse.”
My personal opinion is that Obama is faking his outrage of the dead Americans, because he is trying to hide something and he then always changes the subject.
And now the second Bribery to General David Petraeus.
On Friday, Petreaus was slated to testify before U.S. Congress and Petraeus was to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the whole truth. Do they think we are all Stupid? The CIA has already lied on Thursday to protect Obama and the White House.
What do you think that the American people and NAVY SEALS would think if they all knew that Ty Woods and Glen Dothery were killed by American guns used by the Syrian Terrorists?
The only hope that we had to find out the real truth about the BenghaziGate Coverup would have been if David Petraeus would break the ranks and tell us exactly what the Timeline showed to be the truth; but in the U.S. Congressional Hearing, on Friday November 16, over two months later, Petraeus did not break the ranks and tell us anything new except that someone in the White House had changed the original CIA talking points.
The current information is that according to House Committee on Homeland Security Chairman Peter King is that President Obama and his deputies modified an intelligence report provided by David Petraeus to obscure the jihadis’ role in the Benghazi consulate attack on September 11, 2012.
The critical question now, as usual, is “who changed these talking points and why,” King said on November 16, shortly after attending a closed-door hearing where Petraeus explained his actions in the days after the surprise attack on the consulate and CIA building in Libya. So now, we still know that Obama and the White House are still hiding a Massive Coverup and the Coverup that they are hiding is bigger than the BenghaziGate Coverup.
Then, on Tuesday November 20, we get this news from Obama and the corrupt White House.
CBS sources revealed that James Clapper of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) was apparently the person that took-out any references to “al Qaeda” or “terrorism” from the unclassified talking points given to United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice before she went on four TV Talk Shows and told lies about what really happened in the Benghazi terrorist attack.
However, syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer said on FoxNews to talk show host Bill O’Reilly, “I’m not buying in to it.”
Krauthammer appeared on The O’Reilly Factor on Tuesday night November 20 and said that James Clapper apparently had a sudden case of “Amnesia” after initially claiming he didn’t know anything about who edited the talking points. Those talking points were full of lies and misleading information on purpose so as to support the Obama lies about what really happened in the Benghazi attack.
“I’m not buying it, because the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee says that a week ago in classified testimony that the same James Clapper had said that he had no idea who changed the talking points,” said Krauthammer. “And now a week later, he seems to discover he did? That’s kind of strange. I’ve seen amnesia in my day, in my clinical days, and that one is pretty quick, in one week.”
“All I know is that in the end of the narrative that was spun by Susan Rice and continued by Obama afterwards for days and days afterwards, on Letterman and The View, was that it was a riot out-of-control, because they didn’t want the country to know that the boasting of Obama that al-Qaeda was dead, was simply another lie.”
Now, the real truth on why Obama and the White House have got to lie and continue to bold-face lie to keep the real Massive BenghaziGate Coverup from getting out to the American People.
A few months ago, the New York Times reported that our CIA had been working with Lybia and Turkey to run guns to the Syrian Terrorist Rebels. There also was a ship that sailed from America to Turkey with 400 Tons of Weapons on that ship to give to the Muslim Brotherhood who supplied the guns to the Syrian Rebels.
When we were talking about FastAndFuriousGate, we were talking about Obama and Holder giving away or selling guns to the Mexican Mafia to kill Americans and Mexicans, with the intention and goal that the Obama White House could shock the American people and then demand to ban all of our guns and this is still the plan for the Obama Second Term.
With this ship sailing to Turkey, we’re talking about a FastAndFurious situation that is 1,000 times worse than the original FastAndFurious. If the American people found out that the guns that were used in the Benghazi Terrorist Attack were supplied by our own CIA, I believe that Obama would have a few questions that he could not answer, although he would continue to lie and lie and lie.
Also, from very reliable sources, Obama had 13 reports on his desk on the morning after the Terrorist Attack and not one single report had anything about an anti-Muhammed video that caused the Benghazi Attack. So the bottom line is that Obama and our CIA supplied all of the guns to the Syrian and Lybian Terrorists that killed our four Americans.
And the sad thing is that all of the dead people and alive people that voted for Obama and are getting Free Food and Free Phones, do not care if Obama lies or kills, as long as they continue to get their Free Food and Free Phones.
One more piece of information that has been uncovered is that Sean Smith sent numerous emails out that stated that he was in “huge danger” and if he did not make it back home, for us to check-out the “Lybian Police” that were guarding him.
Still another piece of startling information about Obama and the White House is that Russia is now reporting that The Muslim Brotherhood has several of our Stinger Missiles. Since we are using The Muslim Brotherhood to arm the Syrian Rebels, do not be surprised if they are not used on us.
So now, I ask you! Which of the four between FastAndFuriousGate, BenghaziGate, VoterFraudGate, or DavidPetraeusGate is the worst of the four?
FastAndFuriousGate and VoterFraudGate are certainly huge, but BenghaziGate is the most Massive!